Showing posts with label Election. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Election. Show all posts

Sunday

Election 2010: Where do we go from here?

With less than 24 hours before the country experiences its very first automated elections, minds start to ponder: for the collaborator is to hope for the best and for the critic is to prepare for the worst. What-ifs have been thought of, dooms-day scenarios have been prophesied and the COMELEC has still maintained an all-systems go. The whoever the next Chief Justice has been threatened of impeachment, the Senate President promised an election, the House Speaker jumped ship, the Vice-President is still mum on his choice, and all the while, our President is running for Congress.

Noynoy says he'll stage People Power if he loses, Erap says we'll all see each other at the finish line, Villar shows proof of Noynoy's brain damage anew, Gibo claims victory, Gordon is going to sue survey firms, Jamby thinks she looks like Juday, Nicky is at a lost among the trees while he campaigns, JC brandishes the endorsement of 9 Catholic Bishops, and Acosta is still a no-show.

Mar says he is Noynoy's only VP, Binay closes on the lead, Loren says she's the only one with experience, Edu says he is GAME NA, Bayani's new commercial caaaalllllllllllsssssss ffffffooooooooorrrrr hhhhhiiiiiiimmmmmmmmmmm, Chipeco joins in the JC wagon, and Jay Sonza files a disqualification for his missing running-mate.

Gusto ko Happy Ka! Mag-ocho ocho sa Senado! Mabango ang pangalan! Ituloy mo Papa! At your service. Alagang Ilocos itutuloy ko. Hakbang para sa kinabukasan. Galit ako sa buwaya!

Tapat sa usapan, tapat sa bayan. Kapag ako ang nanalo, yang Drugs at sugal, ipatatanggal ko lahat yan! Pagbabago sa Unang Distrito. Maaasahan, may karanasan, may paninindigan. Serbisyong walang kupas.

Tomorrow, I don't know what time I'll get back to Cavite. But one thing is for sure, I shall not miss my date with history. I shall vote.

As for what will happen in the future, that is for Tuesday. Whatever it is.

Tuesday

ACLAS - Alliance of Concerned Law Students

Alliance of Concerned Law Students
Established 1993

Tested by Time, Taught by Experience.
Only one goal - STUDENT SERVICE at its BEST.



Objectives:


1. Unity in Diversity. The ACLAS believes that the Institute of Law of the Far Eastern University is a representative section of the Philippines, a microcosm of our society. As such, we reach out to the various persons, groups, affiliations, and organizations, in the Institute to foster harmonious relations with all students.

2. More than Adequate Representation. The Student Council should, first and foremost, be the voice of the students. As a Party, we believe in the truthful representation of the students’ concerns and grievances to the proper authorities – to fight no matter what and to face the consequences of our stands.

3. Freedom and Justice for all. The ACLAS’ main and foremost concern is the propagation of a free and just administration in the Institute of Law, either by the school administrators or the student leaders.

4. A Tradition of Quality Service. The ACLAS has been the hallmark of student oriented services. Ever since the party was established and countless student leaders have graced the party’s line-up, our projects have been hailed as exemplars of good student practices.

5. Truthful and Honest Administration. The ACLAS believes in the accountability of its chosen leaders. As such, we have been successful in keeping our role as stewards of the students’ trust.


Platforms:


1. Amendment of the Institute of Law Student Council Constitution
Amendment of the provisions limiting student participation in the electoral processes.

2. Institutionalization of the Commission on Elections and the Political Party System
Creation of a Fixed-term Commission on Elections in accordance with University Rules, creation of the COMELEC Rules of Procedure and the Institutionalization of the Political Party System in the Student Council Elections.

3. Pro-active support for the activities of the Central Bar Operations, Legal Rights Center, Far Eastern Law Review and the Moot Court Council

A more positive support for the Institutional Organizations of the Institute, i.e. financial, material and manpower support.

4. Creation of a Student Grievance Committee
The creation of this committee aims to provide an institutionalized venue for the redress of student grievances and look towards the resolution of the problems in a manner that is harmonious and acceptable to all concerned.

5. Continuation of the Law Student Newsletter under a revitalized and independent Editorial System
The Legal Advocate shall become an independent and institutional organization in the Institute of Law in order to foster higher ethical standards for the journalists who shall join its fold.

6. Institutional Celebration of the Law Week
The Law Week Celebration shall become an institutional event that shall mark the establishment of the Institute of Law. During the Law Week, student achievements shall be highlighted and awarded.

7. Institute Intramurals
Sports activities shall become a cornerstone agenda of the ACLAS. Mens sana in corpore sano. Competitive sports tournaments shall be held during the 1st and 2nd Semesters, in order to promote sports activities to all law students. We shall likewise bat for higher subsidies for participants in the Conflicts of Law.

8. Outreach Programs
The Outreach program is an integral part of the party objectives, which aims to help our less fortunate brothers, staying true to our Tamaraw traditions, and causing the development of our society in whatever small measure we may take.

9. Legal and Leadership Training Programs, Forums and Seminars
As law students, legal trainings are essential in our extra-curricular and co-curricular activities, if we can still manage our time. Legal Forums and Seminars should be conducted as much as possible because the Institute of Law is a respected member of the University, upon whom the rest of the studentry reposes their trust.

10. System-wide reform in the Enrollment Process
Problems in the Enrollment process have been the worse issue being raised by students year after year. We shall endeavor to try a new system-wide approach at the enrollment system in the upcoming Summer Enrollment.

11. Voice of the Students
We can never truly define the functions of the Student Council. The functions of the Council are defined by the needs of the students and our needs are overly changing. Just like our government, which cannot act properly if the citizens will not let their voices be heard, the Student Council cannot address your needs if you, the students, do not let us know your needs.

It is wrong to say that the Student Council is working for you. We aim to work with you, our fellow law students. It is with your cooperation that we will truly realize our goals. We are your ears. We are your guide. Never hesitate to voice out your concerns. We are your representatives, and it is our duty to make sure that you are represented.



This area is for students’ voices. We shall represent your voices; we shall promote your interest. You will be our first priority. We shall stand by you although out. We will do it, without promising. We will act on it, without speaking. We will make our stand; together we shall make a difference. Make yourselves heard. We shall make sure that it will reach the highest pinnacle of powers. We shall make it happen. ACLAS – Alliance of Concerned Law Students. All of us are concerned law students, ALL OF US ARE ACLAS!

Sunday

A Spate of Gubernatorial Reversals - Election 2010

What is going on?

From late last year, a series of gubernatorial election contests, particularly those being handled by the Commission on Elections Second Division consisting of Commissioners Nicodemo Ferrer, Lucenito Tagle, and Elias Yusoph, were being decided in favor of the protestants.

It started with the reversal of the victory of Governor Grace Padaca of Isabela over former Governor Benjamin Dy. Based on the 2007 election results, Padaca had 237,128 votes as against Dy’s 220,121 votes for a margin of 17,007 votes. However, the Second Division resolution, showed that Dy obtained 199,435 votes while Padaca had 198,384 votes for a winning margin of 1,051 votes.

Last week, Governor Joselito Mendoza of Bulacan was ordered by the same COMELEC Division to relinquish the post in favor of former Governor Roberto "Obet" Pagdanganan. In 2007, Mendoza won in 14 out of 24 towns, barely beating Pagdanganan. Mendoza got 364,566 votes while Pagdanganan got 348,834 votes or a margin of 15,732 votes. The result of the revision of ballots showed that Pagdanganan defeated Mendoza by a narrow margin. Pagdanganan garnered 342,295 votes as against 338,064 of Mendoza, or a margin of 4,231 votes.

And just recently, priest and Pampanga Governor Eduardo "Among Ed" Panlilio apparently lost by 2,011 votes against former Board Member Lilia Pineda, wife of alleged jueteng lord Bong Pineda. In 2007, Among Ed won against rival Pineda by a narrow 1,147 votes.

One peculiar feature emerges. All decisions were penned by the poll body's Second Division. All the protestants are Lakas-Kampi-CMD candidates while all protestees are known critics of the Arroyo Administration.

With few months left before a very crucial 2010 elections, the only question that remains in our minds is - what is going on?


Monday

The Presidential Series 2010

Before the end of the year 2009 (and before I go back to law school and lose time over the net), I shall try and try to be informative as possible on the people's choices for our next President. Thus, I open the Presidential Series 2010, a one stop shop for information on who's who in the 2010 Elections, especially those who seek the highest position in the land - the Presidency. This thread shall seek to find out about their qualifications, their party and business interests, their agenda and positions on key issues and their personal life.

As of today, the Commission on Elections has narrowed the Presidential contenders to EIGHT. The candidates are (in alphabetical order):
  • Senator Benigno "Noynoy" Aquino III (Liberal Party)
  • Olongapo City Councilor John Carlos "JC" delos Reyes (Ang Kapatiran Party)
  • Former President Joseph "Erap" Ejercito-Estrada (Partido ng Masang Pilipino)
  • Senator Richard "Dick" Gordon (Bagumbayan)
  • Senator Anna Maria Consuelo "Jamby" Madrigal (Independent)
  • Former Defense Secretary Gilbert "Gibo" Teodoro (Lakas-Kampi-CMD)
  • Jesus is Lord Leader Bro. Eddie Villanueva (Bangon Pilipinas)
  • Senator Manuel "Manny" Villar (Nacionalista Party)
However, the COMELEC still has to rule on the appeal of Nicanor Perlas (Partido ng Marangal na Sambayan) over his disqualification as well as the petition of several lawyers against the re-election campaign of former President Estrada.

Tomorrow, the author shall start with the standard bearer of the Liberal Party, and current front-runner, Senator Noynoy Aquino.

Thursday

SC extends Voters Registration for 2010

The Supreme Court, in a unanimous decision, extended the voters registration until 9 January 2010 and declared as null and void the Commission on Election resolution setting the 31 October 2009 deadline.

In a 9-page decision, Justice Conchita Carpio Morales directed the COMELEC to reopen the registration of new voters until 9 January 2010. According to the Court, Republic Act No. 8189 or the Voters Registration Act of 1996, provided that the period of 120 days before a regular election and 90 days before a special election is enough time for the COMELEC to make all the necessary preparations with respect to the coming elections. The preparations include (1) completion of project precincts, (2) constitution of the Board of Election Inspectors, (3) finalizing the Computerized Voters List, (4) supervision of the campaign period, and (5) preparation, bidding, printing, and distribution of Voter’s Information Sheet. The Court said that such determination of Congress is well within the ambit of its legislative power, which the High Court is bound to respect, and that the COMELEC’s rule-making power should be exercised in accordance with the prevailing law.

The Court further stressed that the Republic Act No. 6646 or The Electoral Reforms Law of 1987 and Republic Act No. 8436 or The Automated Election System Act grants the poll body the power to fix other periods and dates for pre-election activities “only if the same cannot be reasonably held within the period provided by law.” There is thus no occasion for the COMELEC to exercise its power to fix other dates or deadlines therefor.


Full text of decision:

Kabataan Party List v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 189868, 15 December 2009.

Friday

Appointive Officials need not resign

Appointive officials planning to run for elective positions in the upcoming 2010 polls need not resign from their posts when they file their Certificates of Candidacy.

As an offshoot of the Penera case, the Court through Justice Antonio Eduardo Nachura states that appointed officials should not be considered as second class citizens, because elected officials and other persons seeking elective office shall only be considered as candidates on the start of the campaign period. Hence, appointive officials shall only be required to resign from their offices at the start of the campaign period.

In as much as I reserve my dissent for this decision, the Court has to come up with such otherwise it would be inconsistent with the view it took in the Penera case.


Full text of Case:

Quinto and Tolentino v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 189698, December 1, 2009

Monday

GMA running as Congresswoman of Pampanga

As if 9 years as President is not enough, GMA is running for a seat as 2nd District of Pampanga's Representative in Congress on 2010.

Legal implications aside, what I bring to fore is not the Constitutional controversy it may cause, but the degradation of the most cherished Filipino virtue of delicadeza. It seems that the impunity she experienced as the Chief Executive of this country has already immunized her of any shame in her actuations - her running for a seat in Congress is a clear manifestation of her family's strong clutch to the Office which she has degraded for so long.

Let this poem be my contribution to this country's disgust...

¡Adiós libertad querida,
adiós esperado durante mucho tiempo la paz.
El enemigo ha impedido
que
de volver a la vida del país.
Tenga cuidado
de mi querido amor,

por el momento
ha llegado a portar armas.


(Farewell cherished freedom,
good bye long hoped peace.
The enemy has prevented you
from coming back to the country's life.
Take care my dearest love,
for the time has come to bear arms.)

Thursday

Premature Campaigning de-criminalized

With a vote of 9-5, the Supreme Court reversed its earlier ruling dated 11 September 2009, disqualifying Rosalinda Panera as mayor of Sta. Monica, Surigao del Norte. According to the majority, the previous ruling was "contrary to the clear intent and letter of the law."

The Court ruled that under the law, a candidate was defined as "any person aspiring for or seeking an elective public office, who has filed a certificate of candidacy" and that "any person who files certificate of candidacy shall only be considered as a candidate at the start of the campaign period for which he filed his certificate of candidacy." Ergo, when the applicable provisions of Republic Act No. 8436, as amended by Republic Act No. 9369, and read together, these provisions of Omnibus Election Code, the law does not consider Penera a candidate for purposes other than the printing of the ballots until the start of the campaign period.

The Court further provides that "any unlawful act or omission applicable to a candidate shall take effect only upon the start of the campaign period. The plain meaning of this provision is that the effective date when partisan political acts become unlawful as to a candidate is when the campaign period starts. Before the start of the campaign period, the same partisan political acts are lawful."

With this decision, the Court said that "Congress has laid down the law – a candidate is liable for election offenses only upon the start of the campaign period. This Court has no power to ignore the clear and express mandate of the law that 'any person who files his certificate of candidacy within [the filing] period shall only be considered a candidate at the start of the campaign period for which he filed his certificate of candidacy.' Neither can this Court turn a blind eye to the express and clear language of the law that 'any unlawful act or omission applicable to a candidate shall take effect only upon the start of the campaign period.'"


Full Text of the Cases:

Panera v. COMELEC (En Banc Decision), G.R. No. 181613, September 11, 2009
Panera v. COMELEC (Resolution on MR), G.R. No. 181613, November 25, 2009

Wednesday

Erap to run as President in 2010

"This is the last performance of my life."

Erap formally declared and swore, that he will run as President in the 2010 Election, under the party of PDP-Laban, Partido ng Masang Pilipino and United Opposition. He made this announcement in front of thousands of cheering supporters at Plaza Hernandez in Tondo, Manila.

He also announced that Makati Mayor Jejomar Binay shall be his running mate as Vice-President. He also announced his senatorial slate, which includes Senate President Juan Ponce Enrile, Senator Jinggoy Estrada, Congressman Teddy Boy Locsin, Congressman Bongbong Marcos, General Danny Lim, Mr. Joey de Venecia, Mr. Koko Pimentel and two guest candidates, Senator Miriam Defensor Santiago and Congressman Ompong Plaza.

I shall make my legal comment later.

22 October 2009
Click to read my legal comment.

Friday

Sometimes, 'what is legal?' may not necessarily be 'what is right?'

"I know, but this is just... wrong, isn't it ? I manipulated the system. Just because you bought it doesn't mean I'm right. It's a technicality!"

-Jim Carrey


The quote above taken from the movie Liar! Liar!. In this sequence, Jim Carrey, as the defense attorney Fletcher Reede, asks the judge to reconsider his just recently concluded judgment

It is a commonly accepted belief that in the beginning, all laws are meant to be just and fair. Created by God and laid down by men in order to govern their relations between each other on the principle of equity; laws have been regarded as the bastion of equality, looking neither upon one's gender, race nor creed, but on the merits of one's case. And yet, despite this auspicious and honorable objective, the inherently "noble" practice of law has always, to the contrary, been prostituted by shameless hooligans and is now regarded as a corrupt profession, debased of morality and solely in it for the benefit of gain, as was clearly presented, albeit in the movie Liar! Liar! whose line I have liberally cited above.

The lawyer-to-be in me would love to answer those criticisms, point by point, citing the law of ethical standards and related jurisprudence, to dispel such incorrect view of the vocation I have willingly taken. But current circumstances, even in my own town, just gives impetus to the belief that indeed, my chosen field of endeavor has alas fallen to the "path of the Dark Side."

Thus, I am forced to make a relatively short sighted conclusion of the events that happened, and how the circumstances transpired to make it a reality.

  • Money does not buy you Lady Justice, but it can buy you a chair so that Lady Justice can sit on it.
  • Money does not buy you the magistrates, but it can buy you a lifetime friendship with the magistrates.
  • Money does not influence the legal opinion of the judges, but it can help the judge back up the legal reasons of his decision.
  • Money does not teach all the people how to count, but it can help other people count faster.
  • Money is not the root of all evil, it is the seed from which the root sprouted.
It is just a bit sad that I cannot state it without the elaborate use of words, which to the educated would be more of a puzzle than to those who simply know things.

Pobreng pobre mi ciudad. Como ya cai tu muy pronto, otro ya tiempo tambien.

Wednesday

An Obama Presidency - Its Effect on Philippine-American Relations

Out with the old, and in with the new.

Obama won the US Election and became the first African-American to hold the most powerful office in the United States and the world. And with the change in administration, it necessarily entails changes in the policies by the new president-elect. This analysis deals with the possible implications of an Obama Presidency to the relation of the country that we, Filipinos, hold with so much esteem.

With a Democrat White House, we can see the traditional democratic policies in place, such as social services (education, health care and labor rights), civil liberties, economic intervention, progressive taxation and international cooperation, as opposed to the traditional Republican priorities on defense, conservative views, laissez faire, tax cuts on business and foreign interventionism. This paradigm shift would primarily affect American domestic policies and its international commitments, particularly the its principal participation in the Iraq War. This change would produce significant ramifications to other countries as well, especially that the United States is currently in an economic downturn, gravely comparable to the Great Depression of the 1930's.

Thus, going to the meat of the issue, how will a Democrat President affect The Philippines? Firstly, our country is not a newbie with regard to Democratic policies. As history would show, Democrats were our supporter numero uno since the American occupation of our country. The Democrats in the U.S. Capitol argued against the American conquest of the Philippines in the aftermath of the Spanish-American War. Republican President William McKinley was only able to convince the Democrats to ratify his war acts as the benevolent assimilation of the Philippines, to train them in the art of self-government, on the condition that independence shall be subsequently given to our country. It was a Democrat Congressman, William Atkinson Jones that authored the Philippine Autonomy Act of 1916, otherwise known as the Jones Law, that provided the framework for self-government and promised us ultimate independence, and signed by President Woodrow Wilson, also a Democrat. Almost 20 years after, 2 Democrats in the person of Maryland Senator Milliard E. Tydings and Alabama Representative John McDuffie, authored the Philippine Independence Act of 1934, more commonly known as the Tydings-McDuffie Law, that created the Commonwealth of the Philippines. It was yet another Democrat President, Franklin D. Roosevelt who signed the said act, which provided for self-government of the country and for Filipino independence after a period of ten years. Our country's return to independence in 1946 was seen over by a Democrat, President Harry S. Truman. Democrats in the White House (i.e. Presidents John F. Kennedy, Lyndon B. Johnson, Jimmy Carter and latest was Bill Clinton) have always maintained equally good and harmonious relations with the Philippines. Democrats in the U.S. Congress have always supported measures that benefit the Philippine cause, from economic aid to veterans concerns to international support. In general, Democrats are traditionally Filipino friends in the United States.

And secondly, as it would show, most of President-elect Obama's policies revolve around solving the domestic woes of the United States. Thus, even if he was popularly elected because of the American weariness on the Iraq War, social welfare programs remain at the centerpoint of his agenda. He aims at providing universal health care. He favors higher federal funding for the educational system, invest in early childhood education and accessibility of college education for all Americans. He aims to provide tax cuts to millions of low and middle income families. He favors increasing the minimum wage. He vows to create more jobs. He advocates alternative sources of energy to reduce American consumption of foreign oil. He supports a comprehensive immigration reform legislation. Therefore, on the overall, he has consistently advocated programs that would be beneficial to the Americans, particularly in this difficult times.

Thus, with that in mind, what then would an Obama White House offer a Filipino?

With the economy at the forefront and defense on the sidelines, our more prosperous northern neighbors (e.g. Japan and South Korea) would be the United States primary partners. Singapore, Malaysia and Thailand have the same level of economic cooperation that the Philippines have with the United States. Indonesia and Vietnam are also major trading partners of the US. And more importantly, China and India, the second and third largest economy in the world respectively, figure prominently in Barack Obama's speeches. The European Union is still a major player in the world and Obama is keen on rebuilding broken ties with European allies.

However, American economic survival still hinges on it military supremacy. With Osama bin Laden still at large, the War on Terror is Barack's alternative to a disastrous Iraq campaign. In this regard, our country remains to be a front of the War against Terror. It is being claimed by the US as a training ground for Islamic militants. Therefore, it is quite sure that defense and military cooperation between our two countries are likely to remain strong. But conflicts in some other part of the world, particularly in the Middle East and Afghanistan, are likely to affect the military grants given to our country. Further, the huge damage which resulted from the Iraq War would cost the US a lot more for its re-construction. Currently, the US government's expenses has drained the national coffers, ballooning the national debt. With the country tied to its commitments to bring sanity in Iraq, the spending would increase resulting to lesser defense aid to other countries, namely the Philippines.

If this is the picture of an Obama White House, where does one place the tiny island republic of the Philippines?

The Philippines is likely to remain a steadfast ally of the United States in the Southeast Asian region, being the only colony that the country has ever had. We are only one in few that maintains a Mutual Defense Treaty with them. We are also one of the first countries that responded to the American call for a War against Terror. That fact made defense cooperation particularly well during the last administration. But since Obama is much more interested in securing a better American future, the development of the economy ranks high on his agenda. Although he vows to stop terrorism, he maintains his focus on problems at home. Therefore, with the War on Terror coming second to President-elect Obama's priorities, we may see a stark contrast to the Bush-style cooperation with President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo.

However, Mr. Obama's alleged mistrust of the Chinese would likely place the Philippines at the foreground, as the US has avowed to defend Taiwan against a Chinese invasion. The freedom of the South China Sea has always been critical to world trade, as many tonnage of cargo ships pass through these waters. Furthermore, the South China Sea has a huge potential for oil and gas reserves that is critical to US and Asian energy security. China is re-arming its Navy with Russian and Indian made ships to beef up its blue water fleet to expand its influence to the South China Sea area, but it is still weaker than the technologically-superior US 7th Fleet. As such, the Philippines may still be of use to the US in this area and our security against China would still involve American participation.

Also, his foreign policy states his goal of finishing the fight against al Qaeda and the Taliban and securing all nuclear weapons and materials from terrorists and rogue states. He also emphasized the need of rebuilding alliances to meet the said challenges of the 21st century. In this regard, the Philippines may still enjoy some level of cooperation from the President-elect.

Overall, the Philippines may not be as important to the United States as we used to enjoy in the past. It has its advantages and disadvantages. But whatever, the situation may be, all are one in an ardent desire that Mr. Barack Hussein Obama II would deliver the vibrant promises that his historic election as President of the United States of America have hoped to bring. Being a man of diverse background, may he lead the world to show true democracy, one that truly exemplifies the concern for the common good of man, and not just the desire to exploit the weaknesses of others.

Congratulations to President Obama!

Tuesday

2008 U.S. Presidential Elections

Let me sidestep for a while on my UK vacation to provide a commentary on the upcoming US Elections later this day, 4 November 2008. True enough, you can put out the lawyer in politics, but you can never put out the politics in a lawyer, in my case, a political science turned law student.

US Presidential elections are always looked after in world news, not only because the United States is the so-called beacon of democracy in the modern world, but because it is the election of the leader of the world's largest economy and the only remaining superpower in the world. Everyting that happens in the US has a profound effect on the rest of the world, as reflected by the recent financial crisis, caused by the crashing of Wall Street over the sub-prime crisis. As they frequently say, when America sneezes, everyone else catches a cold. Hence, anything, including administration and policy changes, has a significant impact on the world.

This year's election has set amazing historical precedents. It started with the history set by the Democrats during the Primary elections. It is the first time a woman (Hillary Clinton) and an African-American (Barack Obama) had been major contenders as frontrunners for Democratic nominee. Both of the major contenders in the Democratic Party were history makers in their own right. A relatively young Obama with fantastic rhethoric rides of on a platform of change, while Clinton claims expertise on a wide range of issues. When Obama won the Democratic nomination, he set another record to be the first non-white to be a Presidential nominee of a major political party. After being nominated for the presidency, he decided to chose Sen. Joe Biden, a known foreign policy expert, to counteract the claims of his lack of experience. Despite calls for Sen. Clinton to be his running mate, he clearly walked the line of prudency, knowing the deep wounds of the campaign has yet to heal. 

With his wide reaching appeal and amazing American rhethoric, Obama has brought politics back with the youth. He has attracted the attention of the world stage. In November 4, if polls are to be believed, he may take the presidency, on the people's hope of change. 

On the other side of the contest, Republican candidate John McCain rocked the political world when he chose as running mate, the feisty Alaska Governor Sarah Palin, to counteract Obama's advantage of precedents, because she is the first woman to be selected as a Vice-Presidential running mate. A single mom and relatively young, Palin, a patron of the influential US National Rifle Association (NRA), gave the election a twist, as both parties may now claim history setting records in the upcoming elections.

But history-making facts set aside, the bone of contention still is the expiration of George W. Bush's 8-year term as president, reputed to be one of the worst US president in recent history. Even McCain, his partymate distances himself from Bush. Thus, whoever replaces him has the responsibility and burden to correct his wrong policies, which caused the global turmoil the world is now into. Reality bites us all hard, and the next US President, is not so different.

The failed policies of George Bush makes the campaign of Republican John McCain particularly a distance-me-away and not-a-Bush-look-alike type of slogans. He focuses on Obama's youth and relative unpraparedness to take over the Presidency to veer against the Bush tags. However, the negative tone of his campaign has driven long time friend and republican stalwart Colin Powell into supporting the candidacy of the Democratic candidate. He never clearly enunciated his economic, political and domestic policies, nor did he inspire the more numerous undecided voters to vote for him. Even his choice of vice-president failed to stir attention, except for a few months and the issue of over-priced wardrobe. And with the recent loss of traditionally Republican states, it is clear that we may have a Democrat in the White House in 2008.

Custom Search