Saturday

Sangley Point plans revived

Source: Business World (Philippines)
Date: July 06, 2007


An ambitious plan to turn Sangley Point in Cavite into an air and sea transport hub has been revived by Malacanang, with eight government agencies having been ordered to carry out the project, which could involve reclaiming as much as 4,000 hectares of land from the sea at the cost of P80 billion.

Executive Order 629, signed by President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo last June 21, directed the Philippine Reclamation Authority to convert the former US Naval Station into "an international logistics hub with [a] modern seaport and airport [through] an enabling reclamation component."

Parts of the narrow strip of land, now occupied by the Air Force and the Navy, will be turned into a special economic zone housing "cyber or technoparks."

The reclamation agency was tasked to head a committee that will evaluate proposals from the private sector and conduct a selection or bidding process, as well as obtain titles for the land reclaimed.

"The viability of the project to a large extent will be enhanced by the enabling reclamation in the portions of Bacoor and Canacao Bays to provide a significant expansion district to the limited land area of Cavite City," the President said in her order.

Theron V. Lacson, deputy general manager of the reclamation authority, said the project could involve reclaiming 2,000 to 4,000 hectares at a minimum P2,000 per square meter. This does not include development costs.

The executive committee has been instructed to prepare a masterplan and a feasibility study, and following procedures, proposals for a joint venture or a build-operate-transfer scheme could be accepted in a year, he said.

Aside from the reclamation agency, the committee members include the Transportation and Communications, National Defense, Trade and Industry, Environment and Natural Resources, and Public Works and Highways departments; the National Economic and Development Authority; and the Philippine Economic Zone Authority. A representative of the Cavite City mayor sits as co-chairman.

Mr. Lacson told BusinessWorld the Sangley Point hub would be viable with a seven-kilometer extension of the Manila-Cavite Coastal Road to Kawit town from Baclaran in Paranaque expected to be completed by 2008. "We want the project to be investment-grade, something that will attract investors to make a serious study of the proposal," he said.

The executive order was signed just three days after a Chinese shipping giant announced plans to invest $3 billion for a shipping complex at Sangley Point that could generate 100,000 new jobs. China Ocean Shipping Group Co. CEO Wei Jia Fu made the announcement following a courtesy call to Mrs. Arroyo. Officials said an agreement could be signed in August when the President visits China.

Mr. Lacson said the Sangley Point project is "grandiose" and that all interested investors can have a piece of it. "The will be double the size of the existing reclamation projects that we have," he said, referring to the Manila Bay Reclamation Area in Pasay. The air and sea transport hub will be able to accommodate big ships, with the port having a depth of at least 10 meters. The airport will have two or three runways.

Sangley Point will decongest the Manila airport and solve several problems such as height limitations, with the extended Coastal Road cutting travel time to 20 minutes, Mr. Lacson added. The Revilla family campaigned fiercely for the project, proposed by Sen. Ramon B. Revilla, Jr. when he was Cavite governor. His father, former senator Ramon B. Revilla, Sr., is chairman of the Philippine Reclamation Authority.

The Ramos administration shelved the project in 1994 due to financial and technical constraints, following a Japan International Cooperation Agency-funded study that found that the area was not the best location for an international port due to heavy siltation. Massive dredging will be required to deepen shallow areas before international vessels can be accommodated, the study showed.

The Estrada administration, meanwhile, wanted the Manila international airport moved to Sangley.

Under Mrs. Arroyo, a go-signal had been given for a "modern shipping and air transport support facility" as early as 2002. Sought for comment, officials of Clark airport and Batangas Port said they were not worried that the Sangley Point project would eclipse their own plans to establish big transport hubs.

"That [executive order] is only for shipping and not for aviation," Clark International Airport Corp. President and Chief Executive Victor Jose I. Luciano claimed. And even if there is a plan to make Sangley Point as another aviation hub, Mr. Luciano said the Diosdado Macapagal International Airport in Pampanga is still bigger than Sangley Point. "That area is small," he claimed.

The 2,400-hectare airport in Clark is said to be one of the biggest in Asia, with two 3.2-kilometer parallel runways that can be extended to four kilometers. The airport is four times bigger than the Ninoy Aquino International Airport in Manila. Mr. Lacson said accessibility will be the main advantage of Sangley Point, as vehicles going to and from Clark would have to contend with heavy traffic on EDSA and Balintawak in Quezon City.

For Philippine Ports Authority assistant general manager Claro V. Maranan, Sangley Point would not directly compete with the Batangas Port. Once privatized, the ports authority wants Batangas Port to get as much as 40% share of Metro Manila's shipping traffic by 2008 and become a "world-class facility" by 2010.

"Cavite is a booming industrial zone, it's a potential market already," he said.

He said that when Malacanang asked for comments on the Sangley Point plan, the regulatory agency made no objection. "There was no objection from us because we have no future plans for Sangley Point. It better run by a private operator," Mr. Maranan said.

Cavite residents welcome Sangley Point development

Source: Manila Bulletin
Author: Del Villanueva
Date: April 12, 2002


CAVITE City – City officials and residents here have welcomed Malacañang’s move to pursue the implementation of a long-time proposal for the development of Sangley Point into a major airport and seaport hub in the country.

They said that the conversion of the former American base, now the home of the 15th Strike Wing of the Philippine Air Force and Philippine Fleet of the Navy will surely help uplift the ailing economy of the city which once flourished during the presence of US servicemen in the area.

At that time, they said the city was a popular tourist destination because of its robust economy, fine beach resorts and historical places making it the No. 1 premier area not only in Cavite but also in the entire Southern Tagalog Region. According to them, since the Americans left in the early 70’s, the economic life of the city suffered a major setback and the city has lagged behind other progressive Cavite towns.

Mayor Totie Paredes said many residents have expressed the hope that their long-time clamor for Sangley Point’s development would be realized now that President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo has given the go signal for the conduct of a feasibility study on the development of Sangley Point into a major container port and alternate international airport. He said that his constituents are hoping that the Chief Executive is very sincere in her desire to help boost their socio-economic life and the entire province as well, which will benefit from the influx of investors and businessmen once the development of Sangley Point is implemented.

The proposal for the conversion of Sangley Point was reportedly approved by then President Cory Aquino upon the intercession of then Cavite governor Johnny Remulla. However, it was not able to push through when then President Fidel Ramos shot down the idea allegedly on the advise of military officials who cited the importance of the former American base in the security of Metro Manila, particularly during coup d’etat.

According to Paredes, he got an opportunity to revive the proposal during a meeting by city officials and barangay leaders with President Arroyo at the Malacañang Palace last month. Also in attendance during the meeting were Cavite Gov. Ayong S. Maliksi and Cong. Plaridel Abaya of the First District of Cavite.

“The President who was in good mood at that time asked me on what she can do to help Cavite City which she proudly said is very close to her heart because her grandmother Scholastica Romero was from the place,” the mayor quipped. “I immediately answered back that the city’s ailing economy needs to be revived and to be able to do this, Sangley Point should be developed into a major shipping and airport hub,” he said.

Earlier, it was reported that the President had received from an inter-agency group headed by Defense Secretary Angelo Reyes an overview of the Sangley Point Development Project (SPDP) that calls for, among others, the reclamation of some 4,000 hectares near Sangley Point. Under the SPDP plan, a modern naval-air base is to be built in Sangley Point where a big seaport, that could service giant ‘super panamax’ container ships, and international airport would also be located.

Friday

Deities of Mount Olympus

Well, Bro. Chief Justice Artemio Panganiban, in his Philippine Daily Inquirer column last Sunday, fittingly described the quality of the courts during the incumbency of his law student days as sacrosanct. He described Supreme Court justices as “little deities on Mt. Olympus, whose pronouncements were accepted with finality by the litigants and the public. No one dared lampoon the Court or its gods.”

I still accord high respect to the Highest Court of the land. Given the choice, I would rather be appointed as a justice of the Supreme Court than be elected as Tong-ressman or a Sena-tong. Members of the judiciary are epitomized as respectable and honorable arbiters, whose judgments are proper interpretation of what the law rightfully states. Their decisions ought to be hailed as guideposts of justice, lest confidence in the judiciary erode its moral ascendancy to administer justice. Although, the presence of hoodlums in robes somewhat diminishes that respect, overall, people still honor justices, judges, fiscals and lawyers, the utmost respect fitting for a member of the bench and bar.

Thus, I would like to make a profile of the Supreme Court during the pendency of my law school days. Years from now, I may look back and say that I was a student during these times. These justices, in no amount of words shall influence my quest to be a lawyer. Well, let’s start.


The Puno Supreme Court

Started Law School – June 4, 2007

Chief Justice:
Reynato S. Puno

Associate Justices:
Leonardo A. Quisumbing
Consuelo Ynares-Santiago
Angelina Sandoval Gutierrez
Antonio T. Carpio
Ma. Alicia Austria-Martinez
Renato C. Corona
Romeo J. Callejo, Sr.
Conchita Carpio-Morales
Adolfo S. Azcuna
Dante O. Tinga
Minita Chico-Nazario
Cancio C. Garcia
Presbitero J. Velasco, Jr.
Antonio Eduardo B. Nachura


With the exception of Justice Nachura, most of the justices are the remainder of the 2006 Panganiban Court (Justice Nachura replaced the position vacated by then Associate Justice now Chief Justice Puno). Chief Justice Puno replaced Chief Justice Artemio Panganiban on December 6, 2006.


New Appointments

July 25, 2007

Following the retirement of Justice Callejo, Sr., Pres. Gloria Macapagal – Arroyo appointed Associate Justice Ruben T. Reyes, who served as the Court of Appeals Presiding Justice. He was the third CA Presiding Justice to be appointed as Associate Justice to the Supreme Court by Pres. Arroyo (Justices Austria-Martinez and Garcia were former CA Presiding Justices).

December 3, 2007

After reaching 70 years of age, Justice Garcia retired. He was replaced by Associate Justice Teresita Leonardo-de Castro, the first woman Presiding Justice of the Sandiganbayan.

March 18, 2008

In a very crucial period in Philippine political history due to the NBN-ZTE scandal, a highly-favored candidate of the Judicial and Bar Council replaced the tenacious but now retired female magistrate, Justice Sandoval Gutierrez. Arroyo’s Labor Secretary, Arturo D. Brion, was appointed as Associate Justice. A few days later, he joined and voted in the dismissal of the landmark case, Senate Committees, et al. v. Romulo Neri.


In the following years

Studying the retirement age of the incumbent justices, we are faced with a guessing game. No new appointments are expected in 2008, unless any unforeseen event takes shape, i.e. death, resignation, impeachment, coup d’etat, and such other events may cause the change of the membership of the Court. In 2009, 6 Justices are retiring. Justices Reyes, Azcuna, Tinga, Ynares-Santiago, Quisumbing and Chico-Nazario shall vacate the Court, in that order, after reaching the mandatory retirement age of 70. Thus, by November 2009, Pres. Arroyo would have virtually appointed all SC Justices, with the exception of Chief Justice Puno, who although appointed as Chief by GMA, was selected by Pres. Fidel V. Ramos in 1993.

In May 16, 2010, just before or just after the 2010 Presidential Elections, Chief Justice Puno shall retire. Therefore, the remaining 8 justices, especially the 5 most senior ones, Justices Carpio, Austria Martinez, Corona, Carpio-Morales and Velasco, have the most chances of being appointed as Chief Justice, unless the next Philippine President decides to disregard tradition by appointing an outsider. Among them shall hopefully be the next successor of Chief Justice Puno. Your guess is only as good as mine as to who shall be the next Chief Justice. But careful analysis of the voting patterns and decision making stands being taken by present Chief Justice Hopefuls reveal a very interesting trend. Most of the supposed senior justices tend to contradict the present administration’s policies, e.g. Justice Carpio, Austria Martinez and Carpio-Morales; while Justices Corona and Velasco remain adamant to the administration. It could be an indication that an opposition President shall be elected in 2010, therefore Justices with the most senior stint is leaning towards the reputation of being independent. But not long afterwards, in December 2010, Justice Austria Martinez shall retire too, leaving 4 possible choices. Therefore, 2 main contenders seem to emerge, Justice Carpio and Corona. Again, my guess is only as good as anyone else, but it looks like whoever wins in the 2010 election, these two honorable magistrates are the men to look after. Their voting patterns may reveal their inclinations, but I still maintain high respect for these two men.

Thus, only 7 of the justices shall be present until my target graduation date of March 2011, namely Justices Carpio, Corona, Carpio-Morales, Velasco, Nachura, Leonardo-de Castro and Brion. If I am going to extend to 2012 due to unforeseen reasons, Justices Carpio-Morales and Nachura shall both retire in June 2011, leaving 5 of the present members of the Puno Court. Among them could well be the next Chief, whatever their decisions shall invariably affect and have an effect my legal practice. Thus, to look after the composition of the Court shall be the constant pursuit of this person, as I too shall be appointed there in the future.

Hehe!

Thursday

Who are Arriba Lawyers? Where are they?

I have managed to browse a thread in Pinoy Exchange, courtesy of Batch Niño Sergio Olegario de Gala Liwanag (hehe). It is about Letran Alumni who took up or are currently taking up law. So I am also making a personal thread of mine.

Class 2004

Fritz Alfred Bensan, Lyceum of the Philippines
Kathleen Anne Bromeo, San Sebastian College-Recoletos de Manila
Josephine Doria, University of Perpetual Help Rizal
Rafael Lagasca, Lyceum of the Philippines
Marco Maat, San Sebastian College-Recoletos de Manila
Nikki Rose Pabro, Adamson University
Francis Raoul Ragandang, San Sebastian College-Recoletos de Manila
Johnsen Antonio Salazar, Far Eastern University
Cayetano Santos II, San Sebastian College-Recoletos de Manila
Von Kaiser Soro, Jr., Lyceum of the Philippines
Luningning Soro, Lyceum of the Philippines
Ronald Jose Sulla, San Beda College
Rey Jan Villavicencio, San Sebastian College-Recoletos de Manila

Class 2005

Eric Malabanan, Far Eastern University

Class 2006

Florencio Cloma, Jr., University of Santo Tomas - FEU na ngayon
Sarah Cachuela, San Sebastian College-Recoletos de Manila
Eliza Humilde, Far Eastern University (LOA)
Erika Lavega, Far Eastern University
Ma. Ekathlyn Ong, University of Santo Tomas
Melvin Castor Silvestre, Arellano University

Class 2007

Rodolfo Ang, Jr., University of Santo Tomas
Heherson Balao, Arellano University (LOA)
Bryan Bautista, University of Santo Tomas - FEU na ngayon
Sheryll Dungca, Far Eastern University
Ian Encarnacion, Far Eastern University
Ryan Joshua Endaya, University of Santo Tomas
Geraldine Entila, Adamson University
Niño Sergio Liwanag, Far Eastern University
Bai Rahbia Zoraydah Lucman, Ateneo de Manila University
Marvin Benjamin Quevedo, University of Santo Tomas
Gerald Santiago, Polytechnic University of the Philippines (LOA)
Joel Enrico Santos, Lyceum of the Philippines
Rimmuel Santos, Lyceum of the Philippines (LOA)
Achilles Temanil, University of Santo Tomas

Wednesday

Summer Vacation, at long last!

Wow! I really can feel that it is vacation time.

It has been a long time since I have posted a blog. I have been busy reading books and finishing case digests for my summer course. Pa-bibo kasi eh, I took those advance courses in Torts & Damages and Problem Areas in Legal Ethics Elective. Well, the good thing is that I just took my Intro to Legal Ethics last semester, so going thru PALE is just like a review of ITLE. Plus, T & D is not much of a drag either. Basically, it speaks that if you hurt a person, whether intentionally or negligently, you are liable for damages he suffered because of your acts. Simple common sense – hurt someone equals damages. But of course, several exculpatory doctrines apply, like res ipsa loquitur, last clear chance, captain of the ship, contributory negligence, and proximate cause, etc, etc, etc, affect the civil liability for damages of the tortfeasor. Well, I better not discuss this here; it may be quite nose-bleeding for innocent layman. I would not want to be charged for intentionally causing the reader’s noses to bleed, hehe!

But going back to the main topic of herein blog’s post, vacation, where would I go for such well needed respite? I really need it. Well, I’ll get back on this thread. Soon.
Custom Search